Another benefit is that Synology will also offer methods and tools to back up your ABB archive in case anything happens to a Synology NAS performing the task. Also, the way the backups are executed, corruption of the backup volume is not happening as often as it is known to happen while using TM. To begin, speed vise, ABB has the upper hand here as backups are really fast compared to TM. Truth be told TM does offer a unique view and experience while working with your live and backed-up data, something that ABB can't offer, but on the other hand, there is a number of benefits to moving to the ABB platform. It took a long time for this implementation to get released but now that it is here, it is indeed an upgrade compared to Apple's TM. Again, personally, I wanted to secure my single-drive Mac device with a backup, and apart from an external USB drive (or using Time Capsule by Apple), there was nothing but a NAS-type device.Īctive Backup for Business 2.5 introduced support for macOSĪctive Backup for Business is a huge success for Synology as it offers backup of any number of endpoint devices from Windows and Linux OS (both desktop and server version), VMs, file servers, and now finally macOS. ![]() Initially, anything more than AFP and SMB protocol as well as Time Machine backup was not needed, as for the most part file sharing and data protection was the main demand. ![]() Talking from my personal experience as a full-time Apple user since 2008, there were a handful of options that, back then, DSM supported for the Apple/macOS platform. This article will cover some of the products and services that are supported for the Apple eco-system in order to demonstrate where the focus is, as well as to give an overview of what does work when Apple and Synology are combined and what doesn't, or needs more work. Truth be told, the macOS system was not always the platform that had 100% support since day one, but Synology is not always to blame here, Apple can take some of that credit as well. Is this because the line of products Apple has moved beyond the default desktop and mobile computer form factor? Could be, but the point is that if you are an Apple user, Synology could be the brand you are looking for regardless of your Apple device of choice.Īlso, worth mentioning is that since Synology has made a move to expand its portfolio of services to cloud services with their C2 platform, support for Apple products has also been included. ![]() In the case of Synology's support of Apple products, it has been present for years if not decades, but since DSM 6 version there is much more love coming from Synology than ever before. ![]() Thank you for your time.While network attach storage devices are generally made to be compatible with all major OS platforms to date, some favor one more than the other. I checked running processes on my system and your Cloud Station apps are among the last few 32-bit holdouts.Ĭurrently, Cloud Station Backup and Cloud Station Drive appear to be only available in 32-bit (there's only one dmg image available for macOS in your Download Center, and as you can see from the attached screenshot of Activity Monitor, they are 32-bit builds).ĭo you plan to release 64-bit builds soon? That would be great for memory usage, battery life and such, and it needs to be done eventually anyway. Yesterday, Apple announced in the Platforms State of the Union session of WWDC ( ) that the upcoming macOS 10.13 High Sierra will be the "last macOS release to support 32-bit apps without compromises", indicating that they may start aggressively warning users about 32-bit apps and eventually phase them out over the next year or two. This is an inquiry (and reminder) about your plans to ship 64-bit builds of your Cloud Station Backup and Cloud Station Drive Mac clients.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |